Sometimes i get involved

I look at some thinking that goes around and I cannot remain silent. Shankara too could not remain silent and he got permission for 16 years. Only. he vanished when he was 32.

I withdrew at the age of 62. This days I am again back trying to straighten tail of two dogs. Democracy is the name of one dog. Religion is the name of the other dog.

It started with someone proposing a solution to India unemployment. Here is the dialogue:

Me: as if right now there is no mass unemployment

Other: Actually there is, but it's about to get much much  worse in the near future. And this is regardless of who wins the elections.

as if election supposed to solve problem if any

Me: economic theory of maya ha ha!

we, having university education, know that there is no conclusion possible from false or wrong hypothesis. only purpose of education is to teach the difference between truth or false. i do not see any today practices truth. you cannot reverse this. a smart person destroys the fabric of society. how can one be smart and yet try not to benefit more and give less. india has far too many smart people that creates exponential growth of unemployment or inactivity. cooperatives required more than corporations.

Although there is nothing called hindu religion but I get involved in such discussion and I cannot straighten the tail of the religion dog. Discussion here is around blasphemy permitted in Hinduism. Vedanta put end to religious practice if any preached or prescribed in vedas. Veda was fragmented into 4 parts and shelved. vedanta asked and answered the question of Creator in affirmative that is verifiable and can be witnessed by anyone willing to take the trouble. Creation in negative as false or illusion or entirely hypothetical. it is blasphemy if the there is mass belief that location of creator is vatican or mecca or kailash .... creator is here and now and absent

https://www.crosswalk.com/faith/spiritual-life/blasphemy-what-is-it-and-why-is-it-so-deadly.html

Yajnavalkya and Gargi episode is part of Brihadarnyaka Upanishad. Upanishad is part of Vedanta is blasphemy of concept of God as written in Veda and practiced as ritual. Many of Upanishads are simply questioning any good coming from these rituals.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nachiketa
However Gargi persistently opposed Yajnavalkya when he claimed his supremacy of knower Brahman by asking the same question again and again – who is the creator of creator?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gargi_Vachaknavi
Yagyavalkya stopped her saying don’t pursue illogic otherwise your head will fall off. Induction or recursive definition if at all exists for finite positive integer when defined for zero. One is illogical if she asks what is before zero!

religion is not supposed to liberate people. it is supposed to tie people to a group of practitioners ... separating them from infidels.

both concepts dharma and karma originated after vedas ~ vedanta. dharma defines the characteristics of the creator that is not illusion or false. karma is the hypothesis one indulges in thinking that it is a manifestation of the creator. illusion is one's own hypothetical world that does not ever exist except in one's dream. without a trace of truth. there is one and only way to deal with one's own world ~  no further indulgence.

FULLSTOP

shankara too had to put a deliberate limit to his own indulgence with his world for 16 years only and no more